Pythagorean Theorem relates the areas squares, but it also relates the areas of circles!pic.twitter.com/2aWTa8kP3B
Show this thread
-
again? please, please, stop retweeting this nonsense!https://twitter.com/hronir/status/1216993503152148480 …
Bro, how do you not understand this. c^2= a^2 + b^2. Multiply both sides by π. QED. It’s not that hard.
-
-
Pythagoras' theorem is totally 100% about the 2D relationship between linear size and area. Please rt this meme.
https://mobile.twitter.com/ValFadeev/status/1155075668008419329 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think what they mean is that the Pythagorean theorem is a special case of a more general theorem. Historically speaking, they might be correct. Though usually people keep the name of the theorem for the most general version.
-
Stokes' theorem comes to mind as an example. It's just a generalized version of the FTC, but no one calls it FTC.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The point is that, as already said, it has nothing to do with the Pythagorean theorem, which is a statement about (tri)angles while your animation is just about the relation b/w the side and the surface of any plane figure!
-
Take any two plane figures whose sides are in a definite ratio, say r/R, than their surface will be in the squared-ratio, namely r^2/R^2, whatever the shape (so nothing to do with triangles, let alone the Pythagorean theorem).
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.