i think it's time to re-indoctrinate the youthpic.twitter.com/tdi0bFAYOA
-
-
Take the 2p orbital, for example. The electron is in a superposition of 2px, 2py and 2pz. |ψ2p> = (|2px>+|2py>+|2pz>)/sqrt(3). Now take the pdf <ψ2p|ψ2p> and you'll see the dependence on the angles cancels out. It only depends on the distance to the nucleus.
-
That's just not true.. a superposition of the 2ps is a superposition of 3 dumbbells each of which has an angular dependence in an independent direction .. it *can* happen that you measure l=0, but it can also happen that you measure l=1
- 13 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
azimuthal and polar*
-
I think this may have been the source of confusion all along? A wavefunction in the |n,l,m> basis should not have *azimuthal* dependence (polar is OK), yet yours has both. So it has to be a superposition (I think it’s |7,6,4> + |7,6,-4>).
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I just googled "energy eigenstate" and I understood it LESS if that was even possible. "a quantum state with all observables independent of time."? No wonder I rage quit my degree.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.