i think it's time to re-indoctrinate the youthpic.twitter.com/tdi0bFAYOA
-
-
'wrong is wrong' No, no no. You can rudimentarily measure the degree of 'wrongness' by a simple mean deviation of the experimental results from prediction..
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
All approximations are wrong. All incomplete models are wrong. That's the dilemma between engineers and mathematicians. But your don't need a fancy 3D electron with colors to build and design a phone, trust me: engineering got this far without that "new model".
-
Incorrect on many levels. The planetary model of the atom predicts that an electron will spiral into a nucleus in less that 10^(-10) seconds, leaving 0 atoms in the universe .. imagine what it would do if trying to build a cell phone on that model
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And you look like you know that much about physics and mathematics, great. But what about engineering? Is the quantum mechanics theory that runs your phone? Did engineers thought about Schrodinger's wave equitation of every 2.45 GHz photons of your WiFi? Believe me: no.
-
Your statements are quite lapidary. Have in mind that quantum tunneling is a limitation in today's transistors and there are a lot of engineers 'thinking' on that. Take it for granted.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.