gonna stop tweeting about politics so I don’t lose all my friends on here and maybe not look at my timeline at all for a couple of days
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @philoso_foster
It’s okay! I also want to avoid the uh, sensitive topic in politics right now… so we can talk about philosophy and cats (and also history) if you like!
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @AlbertLEtranger @philoso_foster
Yeah lets keep it low key and caj here on twitter dot com! Avoid potentially sensitive topics by discussion g matters so abstruse they can't possibly offend. So, as a proposed topic, has anyone heard of this rather fascinating idea folk are referring to as "panpsychism"?
4 replies 0 retweets 13 likes -
I came across a marvelous proof of panpsychism just now
2 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @litgenstein @lastpositivist and
the ontological argument but for panpsychism
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @InertialObservr @litgenstein and
Liam Bright Retweeted Liam Bright
Liam Bright added,
Liam Bright @lastpositivistEr folks, not to blow up the internet or anything, but, like, I think I legit actually have a sound proof of panpsychism? Like should I go to Nous or Nature first with this!? Not to give the whole game away but key premise is: P: If sentence P is true then panpsychism is true...1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
Replying to @lastpositivist @litgenstein and
did you ever suppose P?
3:52 PM - 15 Jan 2020
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.