Show this thread
-
Well, because they don't have a trajectory. The classical concept of motion requires the existence of an x(t).
you're saying that un-defined trajectory means 0 velocity, which doesn't follow. It's ill-defined, not zero. That's like saying 1/0 = 0
-
-
No, exactly, it is a concept that only arises in the classical limit so I am saying that we can't talk about the "motion" of an electron the same way we can't talk about the "spinning" of an electron. Unless we redefine these concepts.
-
i see what you're saying .. yea i personally emphasize both equally but I see your point
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.