An instance of retrospective bigoteering. Soon he will go after The Hamurabi code. https://www.academia.edu/38433249/Principia_Politica … https://twitter.com/InertialObservr/status/1200642160648835072 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
-
Replying to @InertialObservr @nntaleb
Hélvio Vairinhos Retweeted Hélvio Vairinhos
I read it earlier today, and in there you mention F*** diagrams, and that you didn’t even like his lectures, which to me sounds like it’d be ok if they didn’t exist. It shows comfort in deleting Feynman from his science. https://twitter.com/hvairinhos/status/1200708923650650112?s=21 …https://twitter.com/hvairinhos/status/1200708923650650112 …
Hélvio Vairinhos added,
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @hvairinhos @nntaleb
okay (1) F*** was literally a joke, so yea chill.. and (2) I said i didn't like Walter Lewin's lecutures, not Feynman's .. so yea, be sure to read the thread
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @InertialObservr @nntaleb
Ok, not Feynman’s lectures, I got that wrong. But F*** is a pretty bad & tendentious joke in the context of your original tweet. I hope you understand how bigoted retro-judgement is. You’d have to cancel him, Einstein, Heisenberg, probably everyone.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
And let me remind you that you also shared an article which concludes with: “So no, the life of the scientist cannot be separated from the science.” If that’s what you side with, it may be very popular in academia, but it’s f*** dangerous!
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
i don't agree with that part obviously, which I CLARIFIED IN THE THREAD! ITS ONLY 4 TWEETS JUST READ IT
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.