-
-
Replying to @InertialObservr
My favorite is this, thoughpic.twitter.com/DmxA9flSKH
2 replies 10 retweets 69 likes -
Replying to @indutny @InertialObservr
Thought this was going to be initial and final states bottom to top or left to right
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @AFreddiePage @InertialObservr
This seems to be resolved in most modern literature and textbooks. Everywhere I look I see horizontal (left -> right) diagrams.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @InertialObservr @AFreddiePage
While P&S is nice, I guess I had different textbooks in mind: * https://schwartzqft.fas.harvard.edu/ * http://web.physics.ucsb.edu/~mark/qft.html * http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/qft.html … Weinberg seems to use bottom-top diagrams just as P&S so apparently the habits broke around 2000’s
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
You are totally right, though. I've overlooked the fact that P&S did it.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Speaking of, if you don’t mind me asking, what is your favorite QFT textbook?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
This may be a cop out but I don’t have one .. I have a scattered working knowledge of all them .. if I had to pick one it’s definitely Schwartz
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.