Does it make sense to say that the processes represented by Feynman diagrams and path integrals (like beta decay) are “real?” If you want to say in what sense they are or are not real, please respond!
-
-
Replying to @litgenstein
Only asymptotic states (ie on-shell) are “real” ..
5 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @LambdaQG @litgenstein
By definition vacua are constructed to be Lorentz invariant.. I know QFT on curved spacetime a exist and are just fine , but its writing the curvature source terms that’s the hard part
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @LambdaQG @litgenstein
No .. I’m just talking about the fact writing down a QFT for GR is hard
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Replying to @LambdaQG @litgenstein
I don’t think it would change, no .. conservation of particle number is one of the holiest conserved quantities .. perhaps the definition would change but in a way that it agreed in the SR limit
11:15 PM - 20 Nov 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.