Always start with the killjoy. Then you can safely explain imaginary things that probably don't exist.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWxGXIPx5A4 …
Show this thread
-
that clears it up
i've never actually studied wormholes properly .. though i know about particle anti-particle creation .. i've got to say that paper is the first time i've felt like i missed out by not knowing category theory
-
-
i'm also cleaning my apartment at the moment so i don't know why i'm trying to start conversation
-
Maybe that's why! 2+1-dimensional quantum gravity is one of the few theories of quantum gravity where you can work out everything analytically in closed form. Not like 3+1, but lots of fun!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You seen Suskind's paper claiming that you can mathematically (and physically) analogise wormholes and entanglement?
-
This is the paper: J. Maldacena and L. Susskind, Cool horizons for entangled black holes, https://arxiv.org/abs/1306.0533 That's the paper that inspired my paper with Vicary, where we studied this idea more rigorously in 2+1-dimensional gravity.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.