Here's the Geometric Series proof more rigorously, before someone accuses me of being a physicist — waitpic.twitter.com/R8KTw4rcSS
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Here's the Geometric Series proof more rigorously, before someone accuses me of being a physicist — waitpic.twitter.com/R8KTw4rcSS
Here's my python source code for the animation. The library manimlib is @3blue1brown's graphics engine.https://github.com/InertialObservr/manim_projects/blob/master/geometric_series.py …
Ayyyyy, I've been learning Manim too! Here's a clip of the animations used in a presentation explaining markov chains:pic.twitter.com/4pgXnjOUKW
Nice! yea it really is a wonderful little graphics engine .. pretty intuitive too
Feedback: you need to leave a ghost of the previous formula, otherwise you can't see what's happened. So, just duplicate the object before moving and animating it.
thanks for the feedback! i considered that at first but it was quickly becoming cluttered, though you're right i could have at least left the main formula up
Looks great... buuuuut...sorry to be "that guy"... technically you're starting from the assumption that the series converges at all, which you do not prove with this. Similar to the "1+2+3+4+...= -1/12" argument, right?
Suppose S is finite in step 1 & there we have it the difference between this heuristic and the -1/12 one is that 1-1+1.. diverges always This converges for |r|<=1, and so while nits can be picked, at the end of the day I didn’t want to code up the condition
But no 3b1b voice so YOUR PROOF IS BAD >:(
i already put enough time into this .. it really gives you an appreciation for the time he must invest into those videos
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.