Tweeps, an accepted article has just had proofs returned with in-text citations changed to first-named author "et al", for 3 authors listed alphabetically. Do I take a stand on this and insist that it must be reverted before I agree to the proofs?
I’m a bit confused, perhaps by the wording .. they just cited “et. Al?”
-
-
I wrote "The result of A, B and C [N]..." and they changed it everywhere to sat "The result of A et al [N]"
-
Still kind of confused but I’m on ur side
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
-
Et tu?!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.