Electric Field of a point charge moving 90% the speed of light at its fastest point (All relativistic effects are accounted for)pic.twitter.com/B59QOTtCar
-
-
Replying to @InertialObservr
What do the colors and the different shades of colors mean when around that dot?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @InertialObservr @eashbrook04
The electric field in electrodynamics (in contradistinction with electrostatics) is not the gradient of a scalar potential. Also the potential itself is not a gauge invariant entity. So I think 'equipotential lines' don't have a physical significance. Am I missing something ? 1/2
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ishanmataRTI @eashbrook04
well the scalar potential of a relativistically moving charge is indeed a well defined potential, this is how i colored the contour plot. However, they are only equipotentials if E = -grad(φ), which is generally not true in elec. dynamics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li%C3%A9nard%E2%80%93Wiechert_potential …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @InertialObservr @eashbrook04
so perhaps i was a bit sloppy with my terminology, however, they do correspond to lines of equal φ although that isn't technically a potential
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @InertialObservr @eashbrook04
Thanks for replying. But I humbly disagree. The Wikipedia calculation is in a certain choice of gauge i.e. Lorenz gauge. A different choice of gauge would yield a different $\phi$. E.g. $\phi=0$ in Coulomb gauge. In fact, $\phi$ can be chosen to be any function of spacetime ..1/n
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
... by making a suitable gauge transformation. Since the choice of gauge doesn't change Physics, the real physical quantities of interest are the ones which do not change under gauge transformations. One such quantity is the energy density. But that aside, I wish to say ... 2/n
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
... that I truly admire all your work. All your animations are awesome. Thank you for doing great work and sharing on twitter. I keenly look forward to more content. 3/3
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
yes perhaps you misunderstood what i was saying .. whether or not the scalar potential even exists (regardless of gauge invariance etc) is a matter of debate .. what i was saying is that for a particular gauge it is well defined
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.