she says his peers looked into it and didn’t find anything.. but it should’ve been a outside investigation i say. Then expelled her for not finding an adviser in 30 days which she says isn’t a valid rule either.
I’m a bit confused perhaps by the wording. Because he didn’t defend himself they said they believe him? Do they think you fabricated the data or something?
-
-
-
But what does that have to do with her advisor not retaliating?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.