But the ^-1 here is meaning the inverse matrix?
-
-
-
that's right
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This generalizes to a fun proof that 1 + (nilpotent object) = (invertible object) in a generic commutative ring. Just suppose M is nilpotent and the left series will eventually terminate!
-
It also tells you how to differentiate 1/(some function whose derivative you know), since nilpotency of order 2 (i.e., dx*dx = 0) tells us that 1 /(1 + dx) = 1 - dx
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
In any (not necessarily commutative) topological ring, whenever M^n tends to zero.
-
Don't you need some completeness assumptions?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
And more generally in Banach algebras for elements with norm < 1
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
IIRC this is a key step in proving Kantorovich’s theorem (sufficient conditions for convergence of Newton’s method)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is this a solution for linear algebra?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.