But for weak interactions such linear combinations (also for the charged pions, e.g. π^- = u'd) are still good, right? (Since they produce correct decay rates, cross ratios, for the pions.) What do you think?
-
-
Replying to @SamuelGWalters
well the thing is the thing is that QCD becomes strongly coupled at distances ~ 10 femtometer ~ 1/Λ_QCD s.. so we've never actually seen such a state at those energies .. indeed a bound state makes perfect sense there, but that's just not what we call a π^0 w. mass ~135MeV
2 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @InertialObservr @SamuelGWalters
i think about it in terms of distances cause it's easier for me to visualize .. at distances<1/Λ QCD is well defined in terms of quarks and gluons .. as E->Λ the coupling becomes strong and our perturbative expansion breaks down .. (cont)
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @InertialObservr @SamuelGWalters
So how do we predict the spectrum? .. well for the lighter mesons we can .. QCD has an approximate global SU(3)_L x SU(3)_R family symmetry which is also spontaneously broken to SU(3)_V by the quark condensate <qq> .. (cont)
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @InertialObservr @SamuelGWalters
So by Goldstone's theorem we will have 3^2 - 1 = 8 goldstone bosons .. these are the light pseudoscalar mesons K^\pm π^\pm etc Since the symmetry is Global this means that they should be massless, though which is not the case .. the small masses are treated as a pertbtn .. cont
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @InertialObservr @SamuelGWalters
However, Gell-Man showed with the "eightfold way" if we operate under the assumption that all asymptotic states are color singlets of SU(3)_c we get a spectrum that identically matches the ones we observe, in terms of quantum numbers .. cont
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @InertialObservr @SamuelGWalters
Now comes the fun part: Chiral perturbation theory Weinberg showed that we can still write down a meaningful lagrangian for the low energy DOFs in the following way: Write down all terms of the new DOFs, not forbidden by the global symmetries of the 'parent' theory (cont)
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
-
Replying to @SeamusBlackley @SamuelGWalters
yea i could go on forever about chiral perturbation theory hahah
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @InertialObservr @SamuelGWalters
Honestly all of this feels to me like the secret fabric of reality. I’m so amazed and obsessed. I’m always thinking about it. I’m a nerd.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
yes, i think you're right .. there's definitely something remarkable hiding under the veil of a strongly coupled theory
-
-
Replying to @InertialObservr @SamuelGWalters
And the energies get so breathtakingly gigantic so quickly. It makes SSB and all that seem so LIKELY.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SeamusBlackley @SamuelGWalters
yes .. it makes you think though that maybe SSB is just a special case of a more, general fundamental process
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.