Dimensional regularization is just high-level bullshit
I see what you’re saying .. that’s how it seems at first .. but that’s just cause it’s formalism is annoyingly sophisticated
-
-
Here’s another way to see why it’s sketchy: what dim reg basically does it takes a function that is defined on the natural numbers and “analytically continues” it to a function defined on the whole complex plane. However, analytic continuation is only unique for functions...
-
...defined on an open neighborhood of the complex plane. The function (value of the integrals) on the natural numbers has, hypothetically, many different analytic continuations. The fact that we have a convenient one in terms of gamma functions is just one choice of many.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.