We define the exponential of linear operator (i.e. derivative, matrix, etc.) through its Taylor Series The proof then follows directly:https://twitter.com/InertialObservr/status/1145396940122669057?s=20 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
We define the exponential of linear operator (i.e. derivative, matrix, etc.) through its Taylor Series The proof then follows directly:https://twitter.com/InertialObservr/status/1145396940122669057?s=20 …
I tried to interpret this intuitively but am struggling because it relies on the spooky action at a distance enjoyed by analytic functions and is false for general infinite-dimensional functions. Pretty cool though.
that's true .. I think my Physicist is showing .. we damn near always assume analyticity and function/finite number or arguments
Think of this as expressing wave functions and operators in the position representation, and consider translations https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Translation_operator_(quantum_mechanics) …
This is actually why we call momentum the generator of translations on QM
Is this what e^At (where A is a matrix of differential equation) is all about?
similar idea — matrix exponentials are defined through power series
I might be wrong, but I think Prof @robertghrist talked about this theorem on @myfavethm!! So cool
Yep! Anybody know if this theorem has a name?
I have a copy of this book from the 1800s!
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.