Einstein's famous mass-energy equivalence is also a Pythagorean relationpic.twitter.com/JtXG4VipBD
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
There's also the unfortunate fact that some older books make use of the 'relativistic mass', which depends on velocity, in order to make the formula E=mc^2 hold in all situations.
if you must know .. special relativity is all about "invariants" .. in Minkowski spacetime the invariants are constructed by contractions with the metric tensor ημν in any two frames pμ*p^μ must be equal (since it's invariant).. this in turn means the green equality must holdpic.twitter.com/kXVUzMSRsL
Part of the popularity of Einstein's equation is the simplified version (E = mc²) because the public can remember it without falling into narcolepsy. Most people don't understand the variables behind it anyway.
Twice in my life people (nonscientists) have asked me (nonscientist), "If E=mc^2 and a photon has energy, then why doesn't it also have mass?" Me: "That's not the full equation Einstein found. It's a special case for at rest. A photon is never at rest, so you can't use that."
I've been lied to??
Hard to market E^2 = m^2 c^4 + p^2 c^2. Same reason PV = NkT fell short of PV = nRT. Doesn't roll off the tongue.
Ever since I learned of E=mc2 as a kid I wondered about this. Thanks for finally clearing it up for me! :)
pop culture is not pc
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.