〈 Berger | Dillon 〉

But they very fact you’re defining an equivalence relation between physical objects and mathematical objects is itself the planotism I’m talking about

I’m saying all my mathematical objects are physical.

Hype is the number 2 physical? (You cannot refer time objects in your answer)

2 is physical as much as temperature is.

But answer it directly not rhetorically

That’s two fingers not “a two”

Can anything be meaningfully separated from the medium that supports it? As a materialist, I am satisfied by my construction of 2. Same reasoning applies to the nonexistance of 10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10^10 as anything beyond an expression.