〈 Berger | Dillon 〉

Idk I only have material evidence for finite processes. Seems to me that infinite things are the platonic ones.

But they very fact you’re defining an equivalence relation between physical objects and mathematical objects is itself the planotism I’m talking about

I’m saying all my mathematical objects are physical.

Hype is the number 2 physical? (You cannot refer time objects in your answer)

2 is physical as much as temperature is.

But answer it directly not rhetorically

That’s two fingers not “a two”