@litgenstein can one be a finitist (properly so-called) without being a mathematical platonist?
to me the two are inseparable
-
-
Replying to @InertialObservr @litgenstein
Idk I only have material evidence for finite processes. Seems to me that infinite things are the platonic ones.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Abraximus1729 @litgenstein
But they very fact you’re defining an equivalence relation between physical objects and mathematical objects is itself the planotism I’m talking about
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @InertialObservr @litgenstein
I’m saying all my mathematical objects are physical.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Abraximus1729 @litgenstein
Hype is the number 2 physical? (You cannot refer time objects in your answer)
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
How*
8:11 PM - 28 Sep 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.