Bruh....lmao
-
-
-
-
Replying to @Derektionary @InertialObservr
True but not necessary. Guys, I know officious conventions exist. That doesn't mean they're right and we can't point it out. Many people study math at a higher level without having any idea why saying "f(x) is a function" is a problem, and I don't think that's right.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Silhouette__6 @InertialObservr
Are you looking into math education as your future? Like secondary ed?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Derektionary
Please develop your point. Where you getting at?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Silhouette__6
I'm just asking if that's your future. Are you in grad school? College? High school?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Derektionary
In college, and I still don't see where you're getting at.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Silhouette__6
Saying "f(x) is not a function" is good for teaching, say, grade 6 students. It's important for them to know "f" is the function and f(x) is a number (for each x). So if you plan to teach young kids, this is good. But saying it to a physics grad student is just a dick move
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Derektionary
Bro, I know
@InertialObservr knows it, I'm not stupid, I've been following him for months. But his account has hundreds of followers who come here to learn about maths and physics. Obvy he can use any notation he wants, but I thought it'd be good to add some specifications3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
*tens of thousands ;)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.