taking derivatives componentwise and also it’s an invariant tensor of SU(N)
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @InertialObservr
It's an invariant tensor of SL(3). The invariant symbol of SL(N) is epsilon with N indices. SU(N) inherits as a subgroup.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @duetosymmetry
I'm pretty sure the epsilon tensor is only an invariant of SU(N) not SL(N) .. The δ_{i \bar{j}} is an SL(N) invariant
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @InertialObservr
No. Special linear is matrices with unit determinant. How do we write the determinant of matrix M_{ij} in index notation? det(M) = epsilon^{i_1 i_2 ... i_n} M_{1 i_1} M_{2 i_2} ... M_{n i_n}. You need the epsilon to do this -- it is the invariant symbol.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Replying to @duetosymmetry
good point i thought for some reason the proof involved unitarity
8:19 PM - 18 Sep 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.