You can unironically hold this view pretty rigorously
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I definitely think there’s room for a good induction there, which is why I’d retreat to a similar appeal to the lack of unity between the sciences and between the subfields within each science (which gets you a more modest result)
I can see how that could be made consistent, but I’m not sure I see how it could be made probable
-
-
To me it seems like we don’t have any principled reason to either conclude that nature is such that a unified theory can capture what it’s like, or that it’s not Tradition has simply dictated that we assume the former
-
I agree with that
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.