You can unironically hold this view pretty rigorously
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Dialetheism would like to have a word with you Yeah I guess I have two things in mind: (1) the possibility that the world is “dappled” (i.e., there’s no unified picture to be had) (2) many cases of inconsistency in science that aren’t obviously resolvable
Sure but I feel that the fact there exists consistency in nature should load your prior, since that’s al we have to go off
-
-
I definitely think there’s room for a good induction there, which is why I’d retreat to a similar appeal to the lack of unity between the sciences and between the subfields within each science (which gets you a more modest result)
-
I can see how that could be made consistent, but I’m not sure I see how it could be made probable
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.