You can unironically hold this view pretty rigorously
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Is most of it consistent though
I would say that x and ~x is false is a universal truth at first order
-
-
Dialetheism would like to have a word with you Yeah I guess I have two things in mind: (1) the possibility that the world is “dappled” (i.e., there’s no unified picture to be had) (2) many cases of inconsistency in science that aren’t obviously resolvable
-
You can deduce consistency without actually knowing the fundamenta laws .. the fact that they “get along” in such a way that mathematics is applicable nontrivial, to me, puts the burden of proof of why we ought to infer its inconsistent
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
No lol. Priest gets high before he writes papers
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.