the proof is about some telescopic quotient ? of tan (o^(2^n)) , or something like that ?
-
-
Replying to @rgbxthpkhjm
〈 Berger | Dillon 〉 Retweeted 〈 Berger | Dillon 〉
〈 Berger | Dillon 〉 added,
3 replies 3 retweets 15 likes -
-
Replying to @PhitauSanitere
yea i found it when i was looking through G&R lol
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @InertialObservr @aminorex
do you deal with strange integral in your job ? I mean in physics ? do you care about corvergence at all ?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhitauSanitere @aminorex
well of course i care about convergence.. but it's quite obvious when an integral doesn't converge and i'll see after the fact that i did something invalid.. but then i'll remember the conditions.. personlly i don't think it's a bad way to go about things
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @InertialObservr @aminorex
ok... I think about things like ζ(1)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rgbxthpkhjm @aminorex
well ζ(1) is just a harmonic series and certainly diverges so i don't try to make any meaning of it
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
〈 Berger | Dillon 〉 Retweeted 〈 Berger | Dillon 〉
i think you'll like this threadhttps://twitter.com/InertialObservr/status/1083153666431807488?s=20 …
〈 Berger | Dillon 〉 added,
-
-
Replying to @InertialObservr @aminorex
I should look your tweeter account there a lot interesting things
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.