the proof is about some telescopic quotient ? of tan (o^(2^n)) , or something like that ?
-
-
- 10 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Blocked and reported, no mistakes allowed on Twitter
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Was this made in latex?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
marry me
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
-
Small note: While the first factor with k=0 yield a factor of 2 in the numerator (sometimes also called the nominator) and denominator as well and therefore cancel/divide out each other since: 2/2=1
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.