2) Don't work on it unless you have very novel and powerful ideas. Many of the best mathematicians of all times have failed. Something more than existing techniques and tools is needed. You need a good new idea. Most of what you believe is a good new idea is not. (cont.)
-
Show this thread
-
3) Don't work on it without a clear goal. You must first decide if you believe the conjecture or not. There is no point in trying to prove the conjecture one day and trying to disprove it the next day. A clear goal is a source of strength that is needed. (cont.)
2 replies 6 retweets 46 likesShow this thread -
4) Don't expect that the problem consists in resolving a single hard difficulty. In this kind of hard problem many enemies are on your way, well hidden, and waiting for you. (cont.)
1 reply 5 retweets 47 likesShow this thread -
5) Don't work on it without studying previous attempts. We know by now of several failed attempts, and you should learn from them in order to not repeat history again. (cont.)
3 replies 6 retweets 51 likesShow this thread -
6) Don't go for it unless you have succeeded in other serious problems. "Serious problems" means problems that have been open and well known for years. If you think that the Riemann Hypothesis will be your first major strike, you probably deserve failure. (cont.)
1 reply 4 retweets 49 likesShow this thread -
7) Don't tell anyone out of a close circle that you are working on the problem, or you will be put into the freak category, and it will put unwanted pressure on you. (cont.)
2 replies 6 retweets 49 likesShow this thread -
8) *Do* tell your very best mathematical friends your work on the problem, and discuss it with them. You will need to check very carefully the progress you make. (cont.)
1 reply 4 retweets 34 likesShow this thread -
9) Don't get obsessed. Don't make it your main goal, unless you want to ruin you mathematical career. (cont.)
2 replies 3 retweets 48 likesShow this thread -
10) Don't work on it for the monetary reward. If you want to earn a million dollars or more, there are much simpler ways: e.g. find a nice trick in finance and trading. Excellent advice! His introduction to the Riemann Hypothesis is a good read: https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.01770
8 replies 13 retweets 113 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @johncarlosbaez @rperezmarco
Is it an open question whether RH is independent of the appropriate axioms, the way the continuum hypothesis turned out to be independent of ZF set theory? If that is an open question, I wonder if it’s conceivable that settling its dependence/independence would be an easier step.
4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
I recall hearing somewhere that it’s not currently known, but believed to not be independent of the axioms. Confidence in my response: 4/10
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.