〈 Berger | Dillon 〉

Although easy to understand, it’s kind of funny how if you break the pattern at any point by placing a 2 in the place of the last sqrt(2), it automatically equals 2

It's hurting my brain to think about. Not sure I find this easy to understand. Maybe I haven't done enough high level math to conceptualize this correctly

To clarify, your point is easy to understand, but the OP is not

It’s cause sqrt(2)^2 = 2, and substituting the 2 over and over again will give you his equation

His equation is only true for any finite amount of times you do that replacement and keep a `2` at the top of it. I don't think that implies what his original image looks like it implies. There is no infinite series of calculations that converges here.