I agree that the CS might be the most physically relevant thing, but at the end of the day the integration over LIPS volume is essentially classical physics (including SR). All the quantum stuff is in the matrix elements.
-
-
What do you think is the best way to get across its physical significance?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Why not, I’ll stop dancing. I think that all that exists are fields. It naturally gives an intuition for signal speed and dissolves the “spooky action at a distance” But particles are certainly real, and describing them as quanta of their corresponding fields 1/n ..
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @InertialObservr @litgenstein and
absorbs all our ontological ignorance into the word “quanta”.. it’s not quite clear to me what this means wrt field excitations Naievely I would say that it’s an excitation like a drop of water in a splash that breaks free.. for quantum fields the drops can only have 2/3
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @InertialObservr @litgenstein and
Specific “sizes”, as it were. By sizes I mean quantum numbers 3/3
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
And so cross sections would carry physical information relevant to this, hence why you think they’re the most relevant?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Well cross sections carry the same amount of QUANTUM information as the matrix elements, is my claim
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
cross sections are cool. and as a structural realist, i think they are real patterns. but i don't think they are nearly fundamental. they are a statistic that summarizes some facts about effective field theory in a limiting case.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
I feel like we could make that same statement with matrix elements though of course those aren’t “purely” measurable but perhaps they are in principle
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.