yep, Dennett's real patterns (when we think we have them) have a better grip on me than Humean regularities.
-
What do you think is the best way to get across its physical significance?
Why not, I’ll stop dancing. I think that all that exists are fields. It naturally gives an intuition for signal speed and dissolves the “spooky action at a distance” But particles are certainly real, and describing them as quanta of their corresponding fields 1/n ..
-
-
absorbs all our ontological ignorance into the word “quanta”.. it’s not quite clear to me what this means wrt field excitations Naievely I would say that it’s an excitation like a drop of water in a splash that breaks free.. for quantum fields the drops can only have 2/3
-
Specific “sizes”, as it were. By sizes I mean quantum numbers 3/3
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.