〈 Berger | Dillon 〉

Or a constant function :)

that's what the ln(c) is in there for ;)

so i t covers both cases

But you need something to "turn off" the 'x' dependence, right? Like what choices of parameters give f(x)=2? I think just moving the constant to be in front of the x would fix it(?)

what i'm saying is that the full solution is y(x) = c -ln(x+b) and i just wrote c--> ln(c) for compactness

Yeh but f(x)=2 is also a solution but not covered by this, right?