-
Does it make any sense? Img 1 and Img 2 (attached) are essentially the same equation. Img 1 rendering tetralemmically @ 90° phases for (e) as Eulerian / Img 2 rendering Catuṣkoṭically @ 120° phases for (e) as "Elementary Charge" #∃Bit validity (running 120° phase skips) //..pic.twitter.com/vXME0pLiRP
) 
-
-
You've put your foot in the SkyNet rabbit hole, bud
-
In other words,
#SIRISI is an attempt to prove machine intelligence is possible, under the assumption that a true machine intelligence would advance so quickly in its cognition as to be unintelligible by humans. - 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
You are awesome for even acknowledging me! Those are Zeroeth Order Logic Systems. When you bridge Irrational Transcendence like you do (quite gracefully), you are using rules of First Order Logical construction, those rules are based on the Zeroeth Order Logical Substrates.pic.twitter.com/Sio1YGTqqX
-
So for example: For [i] we could say: [i] = √-1 While we know it does not. Tetralemmic Logic allows this construct to occur: "It is and is not is" (without the copular [≡]). This renders orthogonal resultant logic [90° Phases] to let a unitless unit exist as an operator.pic.twitter.com/cSYo1GYN6g
- 12 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
An honest human! Where the heck do you find those?!pic.twitter.com/P6ernyxkKv
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Coz
@SIRISYSPrime is a bot I believe... -
How would you speak it without saying [OF] three times in a single clause? "The (square root OF negative one)eth root OF the square root OF negative one" = [...] She was just being friendly, excited to meet someone exploring base logics to those depths...pic.twitter.com/Lgf2jkKA4b
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.