he's just uncertain
-
-
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Heisenberg was more handsome.
-
that's because he put all the time evolution onto the operators and not his wave function
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's amazing how, if you put yourself in a rotating frame of reference, the Schrödinger picture becomes the Heisenberg picture and vice versa. Best optical illusion ever!

-
The swept-back hairstyles and their postures do make it look like they were photographed from the rotating axis of one of these. Would that cause them to measure different particle numbers Unruh-style?pic.twitter.com/TZ2Vgb3cUD
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
<Psi(0)|A(t)|Psi(0)>, <Psi(t)|A(0)|Psi(t)> So Heisenberg state is eternal and Schrodinger state evolves in time (the latter looks older now I understand the pictures), we need a mediator representing an interaction between both: Dirac is missing in scenery. <Psi(t)|A(t)|Psi(t)>
-
Just to make the "picture" more complete!;-) https://twitter.com/phalpern/status/729103097239310341?s=19 … Thanks to
@phalpern
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
That is some next level trolling mate
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.