looks like another case of “ubiquitous linearity syndrome”
-
-
Replying to @InertialObservr @litgenstein
Lol, look y'all r normal, I'm the Aspergers, I'm the 1 who encroachs on 3 sd & y'all r the arrogant ones. Lol. Y'all r destroying what y'all inherited is science. It was made before y'all & y'alls arrogance is a disgrace. Each & every1 of y'all r afraid. Afraid of urself
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Jeffmcneel2 @litgenstein
Sorry to hear you have Aspergers, but when it comes to making factual claims that’s not relevant. They stand and fall in their own merits. This isn’t aroogance, this is a request from peer reviewed sources to support your assertions
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @InertialObservr @litgenstein
No it's not. U won't entertain my point. U right it off, not even worth ur time, at least that's what u want to project. The fact, ur scared, all of y'all r scared. Argue with me or shut up but drop the pompous bs
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Jeffmcneel2 @litgenstein
what is your point? That a causal relationship must be linear? A plot of what against what, what kind of regression? The reason it’s not being taken seriously is because the question is just not well posed.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @InertialObservr @litgenstein
Really; then tell me how would u determine cause & effect from an x & y variable & unlimited data? If the Greek method we adhered to for 2500 yrs is pasey, then tell me, what is your method?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Jeffmcneel2 @litgenstein
I don’t know what you’re “Greek method” is, but teasing causation from data is not as easy as you seem to be suggesting. I would recommend reading this to see some of the methods behind the processhttps://medium.com/the-physics-arxiv-blog/cause-and-effect-the-revolutionary-new-statistical-test-that-can-tease-them-apart-ed84a988e …
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @InertialObservr @litgenstein
No, it is that easy. It's 2 variables & unlimited data & there is only 1 method in which it goes from a meaningless correlation to Cause & effect. This is real basic & I do believe u do more complicated analysis but u cannot loose the basics. Just step back, I'm typically right
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Jeffmcneel2 @litgenstein
I’m sorry, but climate change just isn’t that simple
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @InertialObservr @litgenstein
Again with the vague denial. That's a rationalization, u won't say u were wrong. That is how y'all r not worthy of ur inheritance. Science demands humility & y'all will selfishly destroy what was given. Good bye
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @Jeffmcneel2 @litgenstein
Again, I request you cite any respectable scientist sharing your view
4:04 AM - 9 Jul 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.