Here’s a more general treatment of the equations which describe gravity (which are, again, nonlinear): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5256023/ … you won’t be able to read it for a few years—assuming you start studying now—but it’s a good milestone!
-
-
Replying to @litgenstein
Look, u have lost some basics; GR is not stating anything caused anything, it's purely descriptive & mindbogling at that but if Einstein was gonna exert that CO2 caused warming, he would get the 800k data points of the Ice Core & find that LR. It's not there, game over
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Jeffmcneel2
@InertialObservr GR doesn’t make any causal claims apparently, and the causal relations are linear ones
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @litgenstein @InertialObservr
Lol, Look, 2 variables that can be plotted on the x & y axis & 800k data points, is not GR. Again, u have 2 variables & unlimited data & ur gonna say x causes y without a LR? Step back & think on that. Good night
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Jeffmcneel2 @litgenstein
looks like another case of “ubiquitous linearity syndrome”
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @InertialObservr @litgenstein
Lol, look y'all r normal, I'm the Aspergers, I'm the 1 who encroachs on 3 sd & y'all r the arrogant ones. Lol. Y'all r destroying what y'all inherited is science. It was made before y'all & y'alls arrogance is a disgrace. Each & every1 of y'all r afraid. Afraid of urself
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Jeffmcneel2 @litgenstein
Sorry to hear you have Aspergers, but when it comes to making factual claims that’s not relevant. They stand and fall in their own merits. This isn’t aroogance, this is a request from peer reviewed sources to support your assertions
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @InertialObservr @litgenstein
No it's not. U won't entertain my point. U right it off, not even worth ur time, at least that's what u want to project. The fact, ur scared, all of y'all r scared. Argue with me or shut up but drop the pompous bs
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Jeffmcneel2 @litgenstein
what is your point? That a causal relationship must be linear? A plot of what against what, what kind of regression? The reason it’s not being taken seriously is because the question is just not well posed.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @InertialObservr @litgenstein
Really; then tell me how would u determine cause & effect from an x & y variable & unlimited data? If the Greek method we adhered to for 2500 yrs is pasey, then tell me, what is your method?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I don’t know what you’re “Greek method” is, but teasing causation from data is not as easy as you seem to be suggesting. I would recommend reading this to see some of the methods behind the processhttps://medium.com/the-physics-arxiv-blog/cause-and-effect-the-revolutionary-new-statistical-test-that-can-tease-them-apart-ed84a988e …
-
-
Replying to @InertialObservr @litgenstein
No, it is that easy. It's 2 variables & unlimited data & there is only 1 method in which it goes from a meaningless correlation to Cause & effect. This is real basic & I do believe u do more complicated analysis but u cannot loose the basics. Just step back, I'm typically right
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Jeffmcneel2 @litgenstein
I’m sorry, but climate change just isn’t that simple
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.