This isn’t “starting with the basics.” This is a very terrible mistake. @theresphysics might be able to help you here. There’s also no linear relation between mass energy and the geometry of spacetime—looks like you’ve disproved GR!
-
-
R you real? I don't think u are. Look, if u have 2 variables & u think1 of them causes the other, then u plot the data & if u have a Linear Relation then u have cause & effect. Thus, If CO2 warmed the earth u would have a LR with the 2. It's required to say it's the cause.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
It sure as hell is how it works, u idiot. Why do u think Newto went to the trouble to have his most famous equation be able to plot a Linear Relationship? Jesus, Son, this is the most basic of basics. If CO2 caused earth to heat, there Would be a LR! Idiots
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Ur a bot because u can't focus,
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Jeffmcneel2
Here’s a more general treatment of the equations which describe gravity (which are, again, nonlinear): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5256023/ … you won’t be able to read it for a few years—assuming you start studying now—but it’s a good milestone!
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @litgenstein
Look, u have lost some basics; GR is not stating anything caused anything, it's purely descriptive & mindbogling at that but if Einstein was gonna exert that CO2 caused warming, he would get the 800k data points of the Ice Core & find that LR. It's not there, game over
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Jeffmcneel2
@InertialObservr GR doesn’t make any causal claims apparently, and the causal relations are linear ones
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @litgenstein @InertialObservr
Lol, Look, 2 variables that can be plotted on the x & y axis & 800k data points, is not GR. Again, u have 2 variables & unlimited data & ur gonna say x causes y without a LR? Step back & think on that. Good night
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
looks like another case of “ubiquitous linearity syndrome”
-
-
-
Replying to @litgenstein @Jeffmcneel2
If what you mean is “positive correlation”, then yea.. but that can’t possibly be what you meant..
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.