Does that actually depend on that number being a power of 2?
i'm quite sure, since if you make the substitution u= 2x you can see why
-
-
a power of 2 is not necessary in this integral
-
in order for the result to be 2^n, surely it should be
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.