I wonder why most Christian philosophers love metaphysics so much.
-
True to some extent. Most proponent of natural theology (WLC the “professional philosopher”, Platinga and others ) tend to draw from several fields of study to support their position.
WLC does not draw from other sources.. he cherry picks from other sources.. furthermore, by definition there’s no other field except logic you can draw on to support metaphysical position
-
-
I agree it’s cherry picking or obfuscation of the facts (his comments on Special Relativity for example and Thermodynamic Branes) . As for metaphysical position, I meant ppl like WLC also rely on non-metaphysics fields to support their position.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.