You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
"𝑤(𝑛) > 𝑇(𝑛) for 𝑛 >3 ⇒ papers width would itself have to be larger than the observable universe" For n = 4, you're suggesting "papers width would itself have to be larger than the observable universe" ?
No, in that case w(4) > T(4) (since 4>3) so the paper would have to be larger than T(4). w(102) > T(102) (since 102>3) , so the paper would have to be larger than T(102), which is the size of the observable universe.
If I'm understanding what you're suggesting: "Given a practical 𝑇₀, for all n > 3, 𝑤(𝑛) > 𝑇(𝑛), so for 𝑛 > 101 ⇒ papers width would itself have to be larger than the observable universe" But it's still not clear if a very long and narrow paper could be used.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
𝑇(102): the size of the OBSERVABLE UNIVERSE
That is, after folding paper 102 times its thickness will exceed the size of the observable universe.
