You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
To be clear, a mathematical definition of "paper" has been used: An object of thickness 𝑇₀ and sufficient mass density to make such a folding possible.
Pedants: It is mathematically well defined, but physically impossible
ℓ(𝑛): minimum length of paper needed for n-folds
𝑤(𝑛): minimum width of paper needed for n-folds
𝑤(𝑛) > 𝑇(𝑛) for 𝑛 >3 ⇒ papers width would itself have to be larger than the observable universepic.twitter.com/SHimzugJ9D
I've not tried, but you're suggesting a piece of paper must be longer than the observable universe to fold it 4 times?
No, the width is a function of the number of folds
It is Saturday night who has time for pedantry
I love that you argue with yourself over paper folding in order to include people who will do the "well actually..."
Pedant isn't a bad thing!
I take a strip of paper 103cm long: every centimeter, I fold it in the opposite direction to the previous fold - the first fold is randomly oriented. ???
On a more practical level, it is what makes the mille-feuille possible. Yum.
There's also an issue with time I guess. Once I laid down said sheet, I had to start intergalactic travel and have not finished yet my first fold
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
