Does anyone know of any interesting models of the SAME phenomena using Einstein’s field equations that are (apparently) incompatible with one another?
-
Show this thread
-
Paging
@johncarlosbaez@mcnees@InertialObservr@physicsmatt@cplberry@seanmcarroll@gravity_levity@Emmanigma2 replies 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @litgenstein @johncarlosbaez and
I’m not aware of any application of the field equations that are inconsistent with one another above the plank scale.. but I’m not entirely sure that’s what you meant
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @InertialObservr
Yeah, I should be more clear. The sort of inconsistency I’m in would only arise after we make certain modeling assumptions about the system were interested in studying, e.g., that the binary black hole mass ratio can only be such and such.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @litgenstein @InertialObservr
So, you’d have two models of the BBH system that perhaps output equivalent results, but that vary with respect to what our model says the system is like (or how we represent it).
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @litgenstein
When you state it like that, I’m sure that there are more than one could even count
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @InertialObservr
Yeah I was sketching some toy models earlier, but I’m having trouble finding research that satisfies this—the latter being what I’m after.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I’m still not entirely clear on what you’re after
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.