In reality, there is nothing real
-
couldn’t agree more. i wonder if a definition could ever encapsulate whatever (real) *is*
I think so.. I love @AmandaGefter ‘s approach: That which is real must be agreed upon for all “equal”observers, for a suitable definition of equal..
Naturally one would take this equality to be, pardon my username, inertial observers
-
-
I really think she (
@AmandaGefter) had a wonderful insight in this. Therefore, the question of what is real is now an experimental question. Should we feel it suitable to redefine “real” it should be a refinement of this definition full stop. -
rather than redefine it, i’m wondering about how we come to our definition of what is (real). surely, we investigate things experimentally, but philosophically, “what is (real)?”
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.