This equality holds for *all* real numbers N,M 
Can you see why?pic.twitter.com/LvR2r0y6iT
Show this thread
-
Makes sense. In the 2nd line the bounds (inf --> 0 rather than 0 --> inf) threw me off. Any significance to that?
You get a minus sign from the u sub you can use to flip the blinds
-
-
I’m not entirely sure what you’re asking, but I’m near certain there’s no typo
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
The minus sign from u-sub should be there with the original bounds (inf --> 0), no? The bottom bound inf doesnt have a - in front, looks like maybe a typo.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.