So what I'm hearing is a proposal to change from \approx to \squiggly.
I'd love to meet the guy who invented the "≈" symbol. guy: ... Therefore, it follows directly that π≈22/7 peers: umm.. what the hell is that? you can't just say π equals 22/7 guy: No no no.. I didn't say equals.. I said 𝒔𝒒𝒖𝒊𝒈𝒈𝒍𝒚 equals
-
-
-
\newcommand{\squiggley}{\approx}
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
a ≈ b and b ≈ c does not imply a ≈ c that is why it is squiggly--intransitive relations are nervous and fumbling when they otherwise resemble equality.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Squeequals
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Surely a physicist ... and then there’s the guy who decided to top him with the ‘~’ ... also a physicist ...
-
We astronomers love a good ~
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I am deeply convinced it’s from a sweaty scribe counting cattle during summer in ancient Egypt. Finally snapped after counting again and again the same herd.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’d like to meet the guy who invented squiggly leq/geq. “Yeah it’s less than this, give or take a constant, I have no idea how these two quantities are related lmao don’t hurt me”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.