It would be a spectacular triumph for CERN to produce a particle that might constitute the dark matter (like the WIMP you suggest). While possible, I consider this outcome to be unlikely.https://twitter.com/malnadi/status/1132847678663143430 …
-
-
Replying to @bgreene
I would add that this is given the experimental results over the past few years, which have heavily constrained the WIMP parameter space. Initially, they were a good guess but nature just didn't say yes.
3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
-
Yet. But the wimps parameter space is as I mentioned heavily heavily constrained. You can see in this plot that the cross section is getting "pushed" lower and lower at higher mass. This is why people are now exploring the avenue of "light" dark matterpic.twitter.com/n1EaZ2Rc2c
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
There comes a point at which the cross section becomes so small that you conclude that it's essentially zero, implying the particle just doesn't exist.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @InertialObservr @bgreene
So what is it then? Do we need a new Quantum leap to understand what 26% of our universe is formed of, Is it even a particle by definition?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
We don't know what it is. My prior is that it is a new kind of particle. There's good reason to believe this, too. @seanmcarroll does a great job of explaining why in his talk "Dark Matter vs Modified Gravity"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h8KV9Ht5o_M …
-
-
'Wir müssen wissen — wir werden wissen!' Hope It's a Hilbert-ian not a Godel-ian. Thanks Doctor!
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.