“Why is the pilot-wave picture is ignored? Should it not be taught as an antidote to the prevailing complacency? To show us that vagueness, subjectivity, and indeterminism, are not forced on us by experimental facts, but by deliberate theoretical choice?” -John S. Bell
Also What is your support for saying all interpretations are equivalent to Copenhagen? If they’re equivalent, then how on earth could you call it wrong, assuming you subscribe to Copenhagen?
-
-
Not all. The correct ones are equivalent
Some "interpretations" are just rephrasings of Copenhagen. Pilot wave theory definitely DOES NOT contain the same physical content as the original QM defined by Heisenberg, Bohr, Pauli, Born et al and is not correct.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.