“Why is the pilot-wave picture ignored?" Because it's wrong.
“Why is the pilot-wave picture is ignored? Should it not be taught as an antidote to the prevailing complacency? To show us that vagueness, subjectivity, and indeterminism, are not forced on us by experimental facts, but by deliberate theoretical choice?” -John S. Bell
-
-
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
When it comes to the "complacency" of Copenhagen supporters, spurious problems of QM and generally "interpretations" of QM I recommend to read "Quantum Theory Needs No 'Interpretation'" by Fuchs&Peres, "On Quantum Theory" by Englert, and some articles by van Kampen.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sir..I also have a keen interest on Quantum Mechanics...pls Guide me...
-
Purchase, then read, “The Fabric of Reality” and “The Beginning of Infinity” by
@DavidDeutschOxf if you’re interested in that :) Physics books alone won’t help. You need philosophy. Those books contain both.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So what do you think of the Bohm-Hillay Quantum Potential interpretation? I thought that seemed sensible, especially if one thinks in terms of quantum fields rather than isolated particles as one should - any ideas why it it didn't really catch on?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.