Go ahead, square the integrand. π doesn't mind.pic.twitter.com/Cx5HCElH4q
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
You forgot to define "I". I(0) = 0 => I(alpha) = alpha*pi => I(1) = pi
I define I on the first line
Should the last line of the proof have I(1) rather than I?
Should be another equality I := I(1)
about backwards? start with sin(x)/x and move to sin^2(x)/x^2
Just read from bottom to top !
Sorry. I do not understand why I(0) = 0 implies that?. Shouldn't be I(1) instead?.
There is an arbitrary constant of integration in α, and to say that it's 0 we need a condition such as I(0) = 0
good one 
But the squared integrand is strictly less than the non-squared, except at x=0.
No, only in absolute value, because when sin(x)/x < 0 then the square is greater.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.